lyndonjacks.com

a weblog about war, world events, writing, photography, and motorcycling

[powered by WordPress.]

October 6, 2006

Food for Thought

by @ 5:47 am. Filed under General

The following missive circulated on the Internet not too long ago:

“‘HOORAY FOR AUSTRALIA!If the following is true (and I can’t find anything to indicate it’s not), we should take a lesson from our friends in Oz:

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.
A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.
Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were made by parliament. “If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you”, he said on national television. “I’d be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia: one the Australian law and another the Islamic law, that is false. If you can’t agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that’s a better option”, Costello said. Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country.
Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should “clear off. Basically, people who don’t want to be Australians, and who don’t want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off”, he said.
Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation’s mosques. Quote: “IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.”
“However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the politically correct’ crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia.”
“However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand. This idea of Australia being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle.”
“This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom”
“We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, Learn the language!”
“Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.”
“We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us. If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don’t like ‘A Fair Go’, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don’t care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others.”
“This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom, ‘THE RIGHT TO LEAVE’!”
“If you aren’t happy here then LEAVE! We didn’t force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU accepted.’”
A response from a Mr. Ben Ball follows:“This article calls to mind three points:
The United States and Australia share an important fact of their respective histories: Both nations, perhaps more than any other country in history, were created by the unprovoked invasion of immigrants who literally slaughtered most of the indigenous inhabitants who preceded them and destroyed their culture. Most of us are descended from those immigrants. Both nations are nations of immigrants who imposed their will on those natives they didn’t slaughter. Can we logically require modern immigrants to leave us alone in our ways?
There is nothing intrinsically attractive about majority rule. Majority rule can result in systemic atrocities, such as the legalization and practice of human slavery, or—more recently—the murder of six million Jews. The trick is not to have majority rule, but to have majority rule with full protection of every minority. Hopefully, that is what we are about.
Would it “sound” equally “good” if we were to ask all those to leave who wished to force biblical literalism into American law? E.g., gay bashing, the Ten Commandments on the courthouse lawn, denial of a person’s dominion over his/her own body, prohibitions against research that would save lives and cure and even eliminate some diseases, deny the next generation the best education we know how to give it by substituting “intelligent design” for science, deny equal rights to women and minorities, etc., ad nauseum. If we really want to get rid of the fundamentalists who want to substitute scriptural literalism for law, wouldn’t it be only fair to apply such a measure to all who promote it?”

My rebuttal:

Mr. Ball’s comments (Yes, I reviewed the man’s website and accompanying credentials—quite impressive) bring to mind the minister who has never stepped out of the pulpit, the professor who has never stepped out of the classroom, the bureaucrat who manages conflict through video conferencing, and the patriot who has never had his core beliefs tested on the field of battle.  Surely he knows, however, that extremists of any ilk could care less about our ideals, which are indeed lofty and worthy of pursuit.
If the implication is that if every American, and every illegal immigrant who smuggles into our country to improve his life and the lives of his family members, drug-free and nonviolent, actualized his ontological being to the highest order possible, in concert with points [2] and [3] below, and, as a result of this mass achievement, that we would have no enemies I find incredibly naïve. There are some really bad people out there, and we have our share in America—criminals, militant left-wing, and militant right wing. Try spouting America’s ideals when confronting a militant extremist who is intent on sawing off one’s head or shot-gunning one’s face and turning it into a mass of goop (it’s a free country so weapon choice is a given). I believe the individual would be sorely disappointed concerning the consequences of his passivity.
This country is at war. We are under attack from both within and without. Our infrastructure is weakening, and our dependence on foreign oil frightens me. Our declining civility frightens me. To deny this would be folly.
As for Iraq, I, for one, firmly believe that the war has been terribly mishandled and misspent from the get-go. Maybe history will prove me wrong. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that had we not invaded Iraq, the vituperation, vehemence, and hatred, while perhaps somewhat abated, would continue nonetheless. Militant Muslims, i.e. al-Qaeda (I’ll save Syria, Iran, North Korea, and perhaps Pakistan and China for another time) want to obliterate Israel, a country whose people through which many of us claim an ancestral link. The MMs want to drive America to its knees, take us back to the dark ages, because they have not the leadership necessary to even consider equality, much less pursue it. Not having the courage to confront their own self-hatred, they have turned their failed lives into vessels of destruction. So, when I travel about, whether motorcycling the back-roads, flying on airplanes, visiting a mall, attending services or a sporting event, am I going to keep one eye pealed toward those who are most likely to want to harm me? I most certainly am.
Regarding point (1); it, too, is accurate. This country was founded on violence. However, had the British listened to its American colony’s needs during its nascency, the circumstances for revolution may never have come to pass. But it did. And none of us would be standing here today—or in my case tapping on the keyboard—without the blood shed by hundreds of thousands before us. To be ungrateful for those previous who gave their lives is to deny our own heritage and invites in the poisonous self-hatred that can destroy our society.
To get more personal, the majority of white, educated Americans in my and younger generations have never served this country. I wouldn’t have either had I not been drafted. My three older brothers also served as officers in the military. It was just their bad luck to miss a war. Did I want to go to war? Hell no. After graduating from Infantry OCS I volunteered for finance and Europe. Instead, I served as an infantry officer in Vietnam, living and working with South Vietnamese militia. (The majority of Americans served in traditional units. Think that didn’t make my aftermath harder? More lonesome?) I was lucky, though. I was never wounded, and was awarded two Bronze Stars, one for Valor, the other for meritorious service in a hostile environment, as well as the Combat Infantry Man’s Badge.
Have I paid a price? Yes! A big one, for almost forty years. I don’t sleep. I’m skittish. A loaded handgun remains sequestered beneath my pillow. After my return from Vietnam, I was constantly requested to deny my experience, to wit: “You served in Vietnam? Don’t talk about it. Don’t put it on your resume.” Guilt and doubt still surface—large enough reasons that by choice I abandoned my CPA career to write, to make sense of it all. Do I regret my experience? No. I feel sorrow for the terrible destruction, but it opened my eyes. People are people, and some we have to watch out for, including leaders. It’s been said that cream rises to the top. So does properly marinated manure. Grand leadership is lacking in this country, but, even if we had true statesmen, we would still have terrorism.
One of the major reasons America is so vulnerable—in addition to our open society and freedom, what’s left of it—is that so few people have served our country. The entitlement syndrome has spread far and wide, the concept of sacrifice relegated to theory, not action. “Let somebody else do it.” But beware should the military become elitist and the gap between military and civic goals widens unalterably. Enough citizen soldiers help prevent that kind of schism.
In conclusion, despite a flawed America, I retain hope and cautious optimism for our laudable ideals. Also, I will continue to keep a sharp lookout for my enemies and, with a jaundiced eye, will observe those of my own people who spout platitudes … ad nauseam, as well as those who don’t have the courage to face their own demons … ad nauseam.

 

  

  

    

by @ 5:17 am. Filed under Vietnam

For the Vietnamese community in Houston, Texas, Coyote Jack … is available at Thien Nga bookstore at 2929 A.Milam Street 77006. The phone number is (713) 520-8013, or you may email them at: thiengabook@yahoo.com. Thanks for your interest.

May 27, 2006

Welcome to lyndonjacks.com blog

by @ 11:53 pm. Filed under General

Here, you can comment on my books, discuss the pros and cons of the Vietnam war, make comparisons-if any-to the current war in Iraq, and make note on other relevant world events … or, you can take a more laid-back approach and cover the thrills of motorcycling (I’ve logged over 110,000-miles in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and Norway), or just post a leisurely note about the photographs.

Sound Bites

by @ 11:52 pm. Filed under Vietnam

The combat sound bites are actual recordings made at our half-acre sized An Dinh outpost, Duc Hue District, Hau Nghia Province during November 1969. We had been hit often, so I came across the idea of using my little Panasonic reel-to-reel battery operated tape recorder to capture the sounds of combat. Reccordings were made during two different nights of attack by the Viet Cong, most likely augmented by a few NVA regulars. When enemy mortar rounds began impacting, I flipped on the recorder, although I was late the first night because I was “attending to business.” The voices you hear are mine, former Lieutenant James C. Smith’s, and Sergeant Kerbow’s, sprinkled among voices of various South Vietnamese regional force soldiers and gunship/medevac pilots.

[powered by WordPress.]

jour·nal n. A personal record of occurrences, experiences, and reflections kept on a regular basis; a diary.

Get Firefox!

internal links:

categories:

search blog:

archives:

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

hearing:

other:

95. We are waking up and linking to each other. We are watching. But we are not waiting.
The Cluetrain Manifesto

general links:

I read:

bloggy links

respect to:

37 queries. 2.387 seconds